{"id":1001,"date":"2020-03-13T20:55:54","date_gmt":"2020-03-14T03:55:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/?p=1001"},"modified":"2020-03-13T20:55:54","modified_gmt":"2020-03-14T03:55:54","slug":"double-dating-changes-to-the-english-calendar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/2020\/03\/13\/double-dating-changes-to-the-english-calendar\/","title":{"rendered":"Double Dating: Changes to the English Calendar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If double dating evokes images of romance, be forewarned. This isn\u2019t about romance, though the example of \u201cdouble dating\u201d below is, sort of. Let me explain.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/doubledating.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1003 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/doubledating-253x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"253\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/doubledating-253x300.jpg 253w, https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/doubledating.jpg 468w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 253px) 100vw, 253px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Double dating \u2014 not the romantic kind \u2014 was sometimes used to show the difference between a civil year and an historical year in England. England used to observe the civil, or legal, year as running from 25 March to 24 March of the next year \u2026 this despite the fact that January 1<sup>st<\/sup> was celebrated as the New Year festival.<\/p>\n<p>This confusion finally ended in 1752 with the passage of the <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">The Calendar (New Style) Act<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>The act:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Changed the start of the civil (or legal) year from 25 March (Lady Day) to 1 January.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Adopted the Gregorian calendar, advancing the calendar by 11 days.<\/p>\n<p>Dates in English parish records prior to 1752 may show dual (or double) dating. Since the civil calendar year ran from 25 March to the subsequent 24 March, dates in the registers from January 1<sup>st<\/sup> to March 24<sup>th<\/sup> would sometimes show two years to reflect the civil year and the historical year.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1002\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1002\" style=\"width: 1794px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-1002 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1794\" height=\"656\" srcset=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717.jpg 1794w, https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717-300x110.jpg 300w, https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717-1024x374.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717-768x281.jpg 768w, https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/estall-skegg-marr-reg-1717-1536x562.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1002\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An extract from the St. James, Clerkenwell, parish register showing double dating of the William Estall and Hannah Skegg marriage<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>For example, the parish register of St. James, Clerkenwell, London, records the marriage of one of our Estall ancestors, William, to Hannah Skegg on Jan 21<sup>st<\/sup> 1716\/17. The date fell in the civil year of 1716 and the historical year of 1717.<\/p>\n<p>Since in our current era we observe an annual start date of 1 January, it makes sense to use new-style (historical) years when dating our ancestors\u2019 life events. Some genealogy programs allow for recording a double date, while using the new-style year for calculating ages. I follow this practice when dating our English ancestors.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line: Dating was complicated in England\u2019s past. Double dating may have allayed some of the confusion &#8230; though perhaps not to modern eyes. All of this, obviously, was before the advent of Match.com \u2014 which makes dating simple!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Notes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 British colonies, including the Americas, were also affected by the Calendar Act.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Scotland, unlike England, had begun its civil year on the 1<sup>st<\/sup> of January since 1600.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Wikipedia, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Calendar_(New_Style)_Act_1750\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201c<i>Calendar (New Style) Act 1750<\/i>,\u201d<\/a> accessed 1 Mar 2020.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 GENUKI (UK &amp; Ireland Genealogy), Mike Spathaky, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cree.name\/genuki\/dates.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201c<i>Old Style and New Style Dates and the change to the Gregorian Calendar: A summary for genealogists<\/i>\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If double dating evokes images of romance, be forewarned. This isn\u2019t about romance, though the example of \u201cdouble dating\u201d below is, sort of. Let me explain. Double dating \u2014 not the romantic kind \u2014 was sometimes used to show the difference between a civil year and an historical year in England. England used to observe &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/2020\/03\/13\/double-dating-changes-to-the-english-calendar\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Double Dating: Changes to the English Calendar&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-history","category-general-history"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1001"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1007,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions\/1007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/genealogy.thundermoon.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}